Skip to content

The Golden Beauty: Brain Response to Classical and Renaissance Sculptures, by Di Dio et al.

01/11/2007


An attempt at getting closer, carried out in Italy, examined “brain response” to images of classical and Renaissance sculptures manipulated so as to alter the golden ratio of the originals (Figure 2.2). The purpose of the study was to find out whether there is “an objective, biological basis for the experience of beauty” or whether such experience is “entirely subjective” (Di Dio, Macaluso, and Rizzolatti 2007, 1).


The German team had chosen symmetry; the Italians preferred the golden ratio. Both symmetry and the golden ratio have for centuries figured prominently in empirical and philosophical inquiries into art and aesthetic experience; the fact that the debate about their role and status still goes on suggests the extent to which they do not represent merely factual matters but are dense condensations of values and worldviews.

The Italian team used fifteen sets of three images, each including fifteen originals and fifteen modified pictures (seven with long trunks and short legs, eight with short trunks and long legs); twenty sculptures represented male bodies and ten, female bodies. The stimuli, thirty for each of six separate fMRI runs, were presented, in a randomized order and for two seconds each, in three conditions: observation, in which subjects were asked “to observe the sculptures as if they were in a museum,” aesthetic judgment (subjects were asked if they liked the image), and proportion judgment (whether they found the image proportionate).

The behavioral results showed that canonical images were evaluated more positively and modified ones more negatively. In MRI analysis, the results of viewing canonical and modified conditions were first taken together and then contrasted with the rest across all three conditions (observation, aesthetic judgment, and proportion judgment). This contrast revealed “activations” in several areas. Especially significant for the authors was signal enhancement in the insula during the observation condition. The insula is one of the most beloved brain structures of the neuro industry. It is involved in motor control and homeostasis, as well as in interoception and visceral states associated with emotional experience, in addition to self-awareness and sense of agency.

The authors acknowledge that it would be “too reductive” to imagine that the sense of beauty “occurs because” of insula activation; joint activation of many areas and circuits is needed. In sum, could artworks “ever become a permanent patrimony of humankind without a resonance induced by some biologically inherent parameters?” (8). The answer is obviously “no.”

Vidal, Fernando and Ortega, Francisco. Being Brains: Making the Cerebral Subject (Forms of Living)....

Example of the images used in the study, taken from the article by Di Dio, Macaluso and Rizzolatti (...
You can access the article from the link below, or download it directly as a PDF file:

Di Dio, Cinzia, Emiliano Macaluso, and Giacomo Rizzolatti. 2007. “The Golden Beauty: Brain Response...

The Golden Beauty: Brain Response to Classical and Renaissance Sculptures (PDF)To learn more about the Golden Ratio and its relation to beauty, watch the videos below:
What is the Golden Ratio?
The (ab)surd golden ratio | Robb Enzmann | TEDxMiamiUniversity

Finally, you can also buy The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the Extraordinary Number of Nature, Art and Beauty, by Mario Livio, a book cited by Di Dio et al.:

The Golden Ratio at Amazon

0 comments

Comment
No comments avaliable.

Author

Info

Published in 16/01/2019

Updated in 19/02/2021

All events in the topic Chap. 2: Neuroaesthetics:


01/01/1997 (Aprox)01/01/1999 (Aprox)Coining of the word NeuroaestheticsCoining of the word Neuroaesthetics
01/01/2010 (Aprox)Neuroaesthetics as a field of studyNeuroaesthetics as a field of study
01/01/2013 (Aprox)Foundation of the Max Planck Institute for Empirical AestheticsFoundation of the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics
01/01/2008 (Aprox)Coining of the term NeuroarthistoryCoining of the term Neuroarthistory
01/01/2004 (Aprox)Neural Correlates of Beauty, by Hideaki Kawabata and Semir ZekiNeural Correlates of Beauty, by Hideaki Kawabata and Semir Zeki
01/01/2000 (Aprox)fMRI Experiment on Art Creation, by Robert SolsofMRI Experiment on Art Creation, by Robert Solso
01/01/1964 (Aprox)Andy Warhol's Brillo BoxAndy Warhol's Brillo Box
01/01/1989 (Aprox)The Power of Images, by David FreedbergThe Power of Images, by David Freedberg
01/01/2007 (Aprox)01/01/2009 (Aprox)David Freedberg's articles on neuroaesthetics
01/01/1992 (Aprox)Discovery of Mirror NeuronsDiscovery of Mirror Neurons
01/01/2015 (Aprox)Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, by Alva NöeOut of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, by Alva Nöe
01/01/1993 (Aprox)Andy Warhol: Brillo Box, by Arthur DantoAndy Warhol: Brillo Box, by Arthur Danto