Skip to content

Neuro Lit Crit


For example, in 2010 “neuro lit crit” was presented as the “next big thing in English,” as “the cutting edge of literary studies,” and as an approach that might “save humanities” [...] Perhaps such claims generate among literary scholars a sense of “colonization” and “displacement.” However, even when those terms make sense, the bottom line has less to do with fears of oppression or suppression than with points 11 and 12 of our list, hierarchy and neglect.

As for hierarchy, the only feature that makes neuro lit crit “cutting edge” is the neuro label. The alliance with “science” moves literary studies closer to the top of the epistemic hierarchy—as if other methods provided no genuine insights, as if we hadn’t realized that reading literature may be worthwhile before brain-scanning technology existed, or as if assessments of cultural value could be brain based.

Vidal, Fernando and Ortega, Francisco. Being Brains: Making the Cerebral Subject (Forms of Living)....

Below, you can read two articles mentioned by Vidal and Ortega:

Next Big Thing in English: Knowing They Know That You Know

Can 'Neuro Lit Crit' Save the Humanities?



No comments avaliable.



Published in 11/01/2019

Updated in 19/02/2021

All events in the topic Chap. 2: Disciplines of the Neuro:

01/01/1977 (Aprox)First use of the term NeuropoliticsFirst use of the term Neuropolitics
01/01/2002 (Aprox)Neuropolitics, by William ConnollyNeuropolitics, by William Connolly
01/01/1990 (Aprox)NeuroXNeuroX
31/03/2010Neuro Lit Crit
01/01/2007 (Aprox)fMRI: A New Research Tool, by APAfMRI: A New Research Tool, by APA
01/10/2008U.S. Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act
01/01/1924 (Aprox)01/01/1934 (Aprox)The Development of ElectroencephalographyThe Development of Electroencephalography
01/01/1991 (Aprox)Invention of fMRIInvention of fMRI